gno.law

Bank of Martinez v. Jahn

California Supreme Court · No. 15749 · 1894-09-28 · Published · 104 Cal. 238 · 38 P. 41 · 1894 Cal. LEXIS 888

BANK OF MARTINEZ v. A. JAHN, and H. ZEISING

Area
civil
Panel
Robert R. Fitzgerald (author), William H. Beatty, Ralph C. Harrison, Thomas E. Haven, Thomas B. McFarland, Fleet

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Fitzgerald

Fitzgerald, J.

The moving papers upon which the motion to dismiss the appeal herein is based show that the appellant has paid to the respondent the sum of two hundred dollars to be released from the judgment from which this appeal is taken, and that the respondent has accepted said sum, and in consideration thereof has released the appellant from all liability thereunder.

The motion was resisted by the opposing affidavit of the attorney of record for the appellant; but, as there is nothing contained therein that is at all material to this proceeding, it is not necessary to be considered.

As the controversy arising out of this action was terminated by the settlement agreed upon between the parties thereto there is nothing for this court to decide.

It therefore follows that the motion to dismiss the appeal should be granted.

So ordered.

McFarland, J., Harrison, J., De Haven, J., Van Fleet, J., and Beatty, C. J., concurred.

Cited by