People v. Ahern
THE PEOPLE v. MICHAEL AHERN
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery, and appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.
The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, and we find no merit in the assignment of errors of law. If the defendant desired to have the jury instructed as to the definition of reasonable doubt, it was his duty to have asked for such instruction. (People v. Christensen, 85 Cal. 571.)
Let the judgment and order be affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Christensen No. 20650 · 1890-09-10
Cited by
- People v. Gordon Crim. 3882 · 1945-11-09
- People v. Fowler Crim. No. 2136. In Bank. · 1918-08-03
- People v. Rogers Crim. No. 1737. · 1912-08-07