Ex Parte Heylman
Ex parte GEORGE HEYLMAN, on Habeas Corpus
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court.
Ordinances similar to that which petitioner was convicted of having violated have frequently-been considered by this court. The validity of such ordinances is not now an open question here.
We are unable to discover any legal ground upon which the petitioner could be discharged.
Petitioner remanded to the custody of the chief of police of the city and county of San Francisco.
Be Haven, J., and Beatty, C. J., dissented.
Cited by
- California Apartment Ass'n v. City of Stockton No. C027953 · 2000-05-04
- Joint Highway Dist. No. 13 v. Hinman Docket No. S.F. 15110. · 1934-04-24
- E. A. Hoffman Candy Co. v. City of Newport Beach Docket No. 626. · 1932-02-08
- Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaig Docket No. Sac. 3682. · 1925-04-15
- Ex parte Haskell Crim. No. 112 · 1896-04-14