Gordan v. Buckles
ROBERT GORDAN v. A. J. BUCKLES, Judge of the Superior Court of Solano County
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Thomas B. McFarland (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — McFarland
McFarland, J.
This is a petition for a writ of pro- hibition to restrain the respondent from proceeding to hear and determine a charge of an alleged contempt committed by petitioner by not appearing in person in the court of respondent on July 3, 1891, in response to an order to show cause. The facts are stated in the opinion of this court, this day rendered in Ex parte Gordan, ante, p. 478. The petition contains some matters referring to the respondent personally, the insertion of which was a violation of professional propriety by counsel for petitioner. All of the petition is stricken out except so much thereof as consists of a bare statement of the facts necessary to show the character of said order of July 3d, and the proposed action of the respondent thereunder.
Let a final writ issue prohibiting respondent from proceeding to punish petitioner for a contempt in not *482appearing in verson before the court of respondent on July 3, 1891.
De Haven, J., Garoutte, J., Sharpstein, J., and Harrison, J., concurred.
Cited by
- Merritt v. Superior Court Docket No. 6043. · 1928-07-16
- Commercial Bank of Spanish America, Ltd. v. Superior Court S. F. No. 10712. · 1923-11-14
- Bakeman v. Superior Court Civ. No. 2699. · 1918-07-22