Judge v. Ohm
SUSAN E. JUDGE v. ANNA A. OHM, Administratrix, etc.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court.
Motion to dismiss appeal.
It appears by the certificate of the county clerk of the city and county of San Francisco that appellant filed her notice of appeal upon the fifth day of January, 1891, *135and her undertaking on appeal upon the tenth day oí the same month; that the bill of exceptions was settled upon the second day of January, 1891, and was filed the day following.
A motion to dismiss the appeal was made April 15, 1891, upon the ground that no transcript had been filed within the time prescribed by the rules of this court.
Although the time to file the transcript in the cause had long since gone by at the hearing of this motion, still, no transcript was on file at that time and no cause shown for such failure to file the same.
Let the appeal be dismissed.
Cited by
- Scott v. Landis Civ. No. 2397 · 1940-05-17