Fitzpatrick v. Fitch
EDWARD F. FITZPATRICK v. GEORGE K. FITCH and LORING PICKERING
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Foote (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Foote
Foote, C.
— This is an appeal from an order changing the place of the trial of an action.
The papers in the transcript upon which the action of the court below is alleged to have been based are not shown, either by bill of exceptions or certificate of the judge, to have been used on the hearing of the motion, which was granted.
The certificate of the clerk appended to the transcript is in no sense such identification as is necessary. (Von Glahn v. Brennan, 81 Cal. 261-264; Walsh v. Hutchings, 60 Cal. 228, 229; Nash v. Harris, 57 Cal. 243, 244; Larkin v. Larkin, 76 Cal. 323, 324.)
And the presumption is that the action of the court below was correct. We therefore advise that the order be affirmed.
Hayne, C., and Belcher, G. C., concurred.
The Court.
For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the order is affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Von Glahn v. Brennan No. 12152 · 1889-11-22
- Larkin v. Larkin No. 11333 · 1888-05-29
- Walsh v. Hutchings No. 6,886 · 1882-03-14
- Nash v. Harris No. 6,539 · 1881-07-01
Cited by
- Lesure v. Hutton Civ. No. 3544. · 1921-05-20