Ex parte Fenton
Ex parte CHARLES FENTON, on Habeas Corpus
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court.
The record in this case and the agreed statement upon which it is submitted, taken together, show sufficient cause for issuing the warrant under which defendant is held.
*184The fact that defendant had been previously arrested on the same charge, examined before a magistrate, and discharged, is not a bar to a second arrest and examination.
A person cannot be said to have been once in jeopardy until he is put upon trial before a court of competent jurisdiction, upon indictment or information which is sufficient in form and substance to sustain a conviction, and a jury has been charged with his deliverance.
The writ is discharged, and the defendant remanded to the custody of the sheriff.
Cited by
- People v. Belknap Crim. 12827 · 1974-09-25
- People v. Uhlemann Crim. 16326 · 1973-07-02
- Bryan v. Superior Court L.A. 29939 · 1972-07-17
- Arnold v. Williams Civ. 7356 · 1963-11-08
- McGonagill v. Superior Court Civ. 7256 · 1963-03-19
- People v. Brown Crim. 1600 · 1962-02-07
- People v. Buckman Crim. 7109 · 1960-11-02
- People v. White Crim. 6993 · 1960-04-20
- People v. Prewitt Crim. 6444 · 1959-06-19
- People v. Joseph Crim. 5910 · 1957-09-03
- People v. Hrjak Docket No. 1514. · 1927-09-01