Hershey v. Kness
D. N. HERSHEY v. A. KNESS
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Hayne (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Hayne
Hayne, C.
All the appellant’s specifications were stricken from the transcript, for the reason that they were mere interpolations, and not a part of the statement as settled by the judge of the court below. This took away all right to be heard on the motion for new trial.
The appellant’s objections to the sufficiency of the complaint are without merit.
We therefore advise that the judgment and order be affirmed.
Foote, C., and Belcher, C. 0., concurred.
The Court.
For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the judgment and order are affirmed.
Cited by
- Fawkes v. Reynolds L. A. No. 6732. · 1922-12-19
- Leonard v. Shaw S. F. No. 197 · 1896-08-19