Oullahan v. Morrissey
D. J. OULLAHAN v. JAMES A. MORRISSEY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Expressed (author), E. W. McKinstry
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court.
— The plaintiff, having consented to the entry of the judgment against himself, cannot appeal from it, or if he can, can be heard only as to that portion to which he did not consent. That in this case is at the most the demand for costs, which, being less than three hundred dollars, does not give this court jurisdiction.
The appeal must be dismissed.
So ordered.' McKinstry, J., expressed no opinion.
Cited by
- Judnick v. Judnick Civ. No. 3293. · 1920-05-06
- Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. Waymire S.F. No. 4878. · 1907-11-13
- Southern California Railway Co. v. Superior Court S.F. No. 1262. · 1899-12-30
- Fairbanks v. Lampkin No. 15130 · 1893-08-31
- Sellick v. De Carlow No. 14702 · 1892-08-17