Ex parte Johnson
Ex parte ANNIE JOHNSON, on Habeas Corpus
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court.
We are of the opinion that the city council of Stockton had authority to enact the ordinance under which petitioner was convicted, and that so far as it affects this prosecution it is not in conflict with the general laws of the state.
The writ is dismissed and the prisoner remanded.
Cited by
- In Re Lane Crim. 6929 · 1962-06-28
- Arfsten v. Superior Court Civ. No. 1031. · 1912-10-31
- People v. Bruggy No. 20706 · 1892-02-23