Rosenthal, Feder, & Co. v. Levy
ROSENTHAL, FEDER, & CO. v. MARCUS LEVY, Assignee
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Jackson Temple (author), McKjnstey, Patebson
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Temple
Temple, J.
The order appealed from in this case is in no sense a final order, and is not appealable. Furthermore, it is one the court should have made of its own motion, upon mere suggestion. The assignee was, apparently, in default, as he had not complied with section 29 of the Insolvent Act, which required him to render an account at the expiration of three months.
The assignee cannot at any time be heard to object to an order requiring him to render an account. The court may so order as often as occasion seems to require.
Appeal dismissed.
Patebson, J., and McKjnstey, J., concurred.
Cited by
- People v. Allen Crim. No. 436. · 1918-05-08