Sanchez v. Newman
JUAN MATIAS SANCHEZ v. B. NEWMAN B. NEWMAN
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- James D. Thornton (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Thornton
Thornton, J.
This is an appeal from an order in a proceeding for contempt against one B. Newman. By the order referred to, the proceeding against Newman was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. In Tyler v. Connolly, 65 Cal. 28, it was held that there is no appeal from a judgment in a case of contempt. We find nothing in this case which takes it out of the rule laid down in the case cited. For the reasons given in Tyler v. Connolly, we are of opinion that there can be no appeal -here. The appeal must therefore be dismissed, and it is so ordered.
Sharpstein, J., and McKee, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Tyler v. Connolly No. 9,418 · 1884-02-05
Cited by
- Butler v. Butler Civ. No. 8359 · 1967-10-17
- Devine v. Devine Civ. 26234 · 1963-03-04
- In re the Estate of Wittmeier S. F. No. 893 · 1897-09-13
- Natoma Water & Min. Co. v. Hancock No. 14,624 · 1894-03-13
- In re Vance No. 13594 · 1891-03-07