Johnson v. Klein
ALBERT M. JOHNSON, Assignee of Jacob Kaerth, an Insolvent v. A. R. KLEIN
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Ross (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Ross
Ross, J.
It has been so often held here that a finding that all the averments of the complaint are true is a sufficient finding of facts that an appeal grounded on its *187alleged insufficiency must be held to have been taken for delay. The answer contained nothing but denials and an admission of matters alleged in' the complaint, so that the finding that all of the allegations of the complaint are true necessarily covers all of the issues made by the pleadings.
Judgment affirmed, with fifty dollars• damages.
McKinstry, J., and Myrick, J., concurred.
Cited by
- Lámar v. Lámar L. A. No. 19845 · 1947-11-21
- LaMar v. LaMar L. A. No. 19845 · 1947-11-21
- Kendrick v. Gould Civ. No. 3324. · 1921-03-11
- Continental National Bank v. Stoltz Civ. No. 3216. · 1920-03-13
- Adams v. Barber Civ. No. 1074. · 1913-03-18
- McKelvey v. Wagy L.A. No. 2439. · 1910-03-22
- Chatfield v. Continental Building & Loan Ass'n Civ. No. 367. · 1907-10-19
- Homeseekers Loan Association v. Gleeson S.F. No. 1823. · 1901-07-03
- Wolfskill v. Douglas Sac. No. 576 · 1900-02-07
- Gale v. Bradbury S. F. No. 541 · 1897-02-04
- Paden v. Goldbaum No. 19,400 · 1894-09-04
- Boyd v. Boyd No. 19,046 · 1893-01-14
- Williams v. Hall No. 13028 · 1889-07-04
- Gwinn v. Ton No. 12128 · 1888-03-20