gno.law

People v. Bell

California Supreme Court · No. 20118 · 1886-06-22 · Published · 70 Cal. 33 · 11 P. 327 · 1886 Cal. LEXIS 718

THE PEOPLE v. WILLIAM H. BELL

Area
criminal

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The Court.

The transcript herein does not show that the notice of appeal was served on any one. The law requires that it shall be served on the attorneys of the adverse party (Penal Code, sec. 1240), and the transcript on appeal must show it. (People v. Phillips, 45 Cal. 44; People v. Clark, 49 Cal. 455.) This not being the case, the appeal cannot be considered.

Appeal dismissed.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by