Lutz v. Christy
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF A. B. LUTZ, A. B. LUTZ, Jr. v. E. CHRISTY, Executors, etc.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Foote (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Foote
Foote, C.
The only matter disclosed by the. record here, which this court should consider, is the appeal from an order of the court below, refusing to set aside and vacate a former order of distribution and settlement of the final account of an executor.
In our opinion, such an order is not included in those enumerated in subdivision 3 of section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the appeal should be dismissed. (Blum v. Brownstone Bros. 50 Cal. 293; Estate of Callahan, 60 Cal. 232; Estate of Dean, 62 Cal. 613.)
Searls, C., and Belcher, C. C., concurred.
The Court. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the appeal is dismissed.
Cites, in this corpus
- In re the Estate of Dean No. 8,176 · 1882-04-20
- Estate of Calahan No. 7,431 · 1882-03-15
- Blum v. Brownstone Bros. No. 4591 · 1875-07-01
Cited by
- Estate of Harrison Civ. 14692 · 1951-03-21
- Estate of O'Dea L. A. 17536 · 1940-07-03
- In Re Estate of Allen L. A. No. 4964. · 1917-06-07
- Spafford v. Citizens' Trust & Savings Bank L. A. No. 5096. · 1917-05-04
- In Re Estate of McCarty L.A. No. 3923. · 1915-03-30
- In Re Seymour Civ. No. 779. · 1911-02-04
- Parent v. Lloyd Civ. No. 779 · 1911-02-04
- Estate of Cahill S.F. No. 3649. · 1904-03-28
- Estate of Murphy S.F. No. 2218. · 1900-04-05
- In re Estate of Murphy S. F. No. 2218 · 1900-04-05
- In re Estate of Murphy S. F. No. 2218 · 1900-04-05
- In re the Estate of Wittmeier S. F. No. 893 · 1897-09-13
- In re Bauquier No. 14080 · 1891-03-18
- In re the Estate of Wiard No. 13093 · 1890-04-30