In re Estate of Luther
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF C. C. LUTHER
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Outcome
- affirmed — For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion • the order is affirmed.
- Area
- probate
- Panel
- Foote (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Foote
Foote, C.
Appeal from an order refusing to make a family allowance to the widow and minor children of deceased. A homestead, consisting of 125 acres of farming land, also some personal property, had been set apart to the widow and children. The petition for family allowance did not contain a statement that the proceeds of the farm were insufficient. Therefore we cannot say that the court erred in refusing the allowance, and the order appealed from should be affirmed.
Searls, C., and Belcher, C. C., concurred.
The Court. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion • the order is affirmed.
Cited by
- Ruggles v. Welch Nos. 15889, 15890 · 1895-03-15