Thompson v. Spraig
A. THOMPSON v. WILLIAM SPRAIG
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Ross (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Ross
Ross, J.
The cross-complaint having been stricken from the answer of the defendant, the latter pleading was left with matters of defense only. The plaintiffs were, therefore, at liberty to dismiss the action at any time before trial, upon payment of costs. (Code of Civil Procedure, § 581.) This they did—the dismissal having been entered by the clerk. The purported trial of the 5th of November, 1883, was therefore of an action which had been previously dismissed.
Order reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the court below to set aside the judgment.
McKee, J., Myrick, J., McKinstry, J., Morrison, C. J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.
Cited by
- Sullivan v. Compton Civ. 6970 · 1943-11-26
- Alpers v. Bliss S.F. No. 2888. · 1904-12-21
- Hopkins v. Superior Court S.F. No. 2959. · 1902-06-13
- Islais & Salinas Water Co. v. Allen S.F. No. 2216. · 1901-04-06