Sharp v. Miller
GEORGE F. SHARP v. THOMAS S. MILLER
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court -The order appealed from in this case is not appealable. The appellant contends that it is a special order made after final judgment. The judgment formerly rendered was reversed, and there was no judgment in the cause, when the order appealed from was made. The reversal of the judgment and order denying (lie motion for a new trial when the cause was here before (see 54 Cal. 829), placed the parties in the lower court in the same position as if the case had never been tried, with the exception that the opinion of this court must be followed so far as applicable in the new trial. (Stearns v. Aguirre, 7 Cal. 447.)
Appeal dismissed.
Cited by
- Hilton v. McNitt Civ. 25423 · 1962-03-05
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Golden State Co. S. F. 19389 · 1957-10-30
- City of San Diego v. Superior Court L. A. 21653 · 1950-12-15
- Schubert v. Bates L. A. 20018 · 1947-10-24
- Rinaldo v. Superior Court Civ. 10752 · 1936-07-22
- Heinfelt v. Arth Civ. 1532 · 1935-02-04
- Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. Lake Docket No. S.F. 11359. · 1927-06-22
- Markart v. Zeimer Docket No. 2938. · 1925-08-20
- In Re Kling Civ. No. 3326. · 1920-07-28
- In Re Estate of Pusey L. A. No. 5283. · 1918-01-29
- People v. Hamilton No. 21060 · 1894-08-02
- Castagnino v. Balletta No. 11,713 · 1889-07-01