Peltret v. Frank
ELIZABETH PELTRET v. JOHN FRANK
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Outcome
- affirmed — 232.) Orders affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court.
Appeal from orders made after judgment. In addition to a copy of the judgment roll, the transcript contains what purports to be copies of affidavits, and of the official reporter’s notes of the oral evidence of two witnesses. These are not incorporated in a bill of exceptions, nor are they identified by a certificate of the judge, or otherwise, as having been used or considered on the hearing of any motion in the case. Under the circumstances, we cannot consider any thing except the judgment-roll, and as that discloses no ground for a reversal of the orders appealed from, they are affirmed. (Baker v. Snyder, 58 Cal. 617; Angell v. Delmas, 60 Cal. 254; Walsh v. Hutchings, 60 Cal. 228, and White v. Longmire, 63'Cal. 232.)
Orders affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Angell v. Delmas No. 6,879 · 1882-03-22
- Walsh v. Hutchings No. 6,886 · 1882-03-14
- Baker v. Snyder No. 7,214 · 1881-07-01