Security Savings Bank v. Connell
SECURITY SAVINGS BANK v. SARAH CONNELL, Administratrix of the Estate of John Connell
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court.
The claim being one secured by mortgage, and the plaintiff in its complaint having expressly waived all *575recourse against any property of the estate other than the mortgaged premises, it was not necessary to present such claim to the administratrix for allowance or rejection. (§ 1500, Code Civ. Proc. as amended in 1876.) Therefore it was not necessary that plaintiff should set forth in its complaint any such presentation.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer of the administratrix, with leave to her to answer the complaint within ten days after notice of the order overruling said demurrer.
Cited by
- Anglo-Nevada Assurance Corp. v. Nadeau No. 14217 · 1891-08-01
- Dreyfuss v. Giles No. 12430 · 1889-06-01