Heinlen v. Southern Pacific Railroad
JOHN HEINLEN v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court.
The notice of appeal was given September 9, 1882. On the 1st of April, 1884, the plaintiff (respondent) moved that the appeal be dismissed, on the ground that no transcript had been filed in this court. Time was given to appellant to file affidavits showing why the transcript had not been filed. The time given having expired, and no affidavits having been filed, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed. A transcript was filed after the motion was made, but no reason appears why it was not filed before. Appeal dismissed.
Cited by
- Clinton v. Shaw Civ. No. 13810 · 1943-03-16