In re Estate of Marrey
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF PHILIP G. MARREY, RODERIGO WILKINSON
- Area
- probate
- Panel
- E. W. McKinstry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — McKinstry
McKinstry, J.
The appeal of the executor from the decree of settlement and distribution must be dismissed. He cannot in any case litigate the claim of one legatee as against the others at the expense of the estate. (Bates v. Ryberg, 40 Cal. 463.)
A fortiori when he himself is the legatee whose claim he is attempting to maintain, at the expense of the estate, in his capacity of executor.
Appeal dismissed.
Morrison, C. J., Ross, J., Sharpstein, J., and Myrick, J., concurred.
Thornton, J., dissented.
Cites, in this corpus
- Bates v. Ryberg 2,647 · 1871-01-15
Cited by
- Estate of Kessler L. A. No. 20413 · 1948-08-10
- Linton v. Walker L. A. No. 20413 · 1948-08-10
- Williams v. Babb Docket No. S.F. 11937. · 1927-01-14
- In Re the Estate of Parsell L. A. No. 7315. · 1923-02-21
- Hebrew Home for Aged Disabled v. Friedman S. F. No. 7049. · 1915-12-13
- Rice v. Carey Sac. No. 2145. · 1915-08-05
- Murphy v. O'Connor S.F. No. 3972. · 1904-11-26
- Firebaugh v. Burbank L. A. No. 329 · 1898-06-10
- Olmstead v. Buss L. A. No. 327 · 1898-03-28
- Jones v. Lamont Sac. No. 309 · 1897-10-08
- Ruggles v. Welch Nos. 15889, 15890 · 1895-03-15
- Henry v. Superior Court No. 14769 · 1892-03-10
- In re Jessup No. 13124 · 1889-09-30
- Merrifield v. Longmire No. 7,808 · 1884-11-28