gno.law

Estate of James

California Supreme Court · No. 8,292 · 1884-02-02 · Published · 65 Cal. 25 · 2 P. 494 · 1884 Cal. LEXIS 426

ESTATE OF ORPHA JAMES, OLIVER P. JAMES, and J. H. JAMES

Area
probate

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The Court.

The will of Orpha James contains this provision : — “I give and bequeath to my eldest son, John Harvey James, five thousand dollars ($5,000), to be paid to him by my executors hereinafter named, out of the first moneys realized from my estate when that amount shall come into their hands after the payment of all my just debts and funeral expenses; and in case that amount is not realized from my estate, then I give and bequeath the whole amount realized to him, and in the event of the death of my said son, John Harvey James, before I die, then I leave the portion bequeathed to him in this testament and will to his lawful children.”

The court below held that this legacy became due and deliverable at the expiration of one year after the testatrix’s decease, and consequently bore interest from that date. We think the testatrix’s express intention was that it should not become due and payable until after her debts and funeral expenses had been paid. As we construe the language of the will,'it was to be paid out of the first moneys realized from the estate after the *26payment of said debts and funeral expenses. This being the only question presented on this appeal, it follows that so much of the decree as awards $962.50 interest to respondent on said legacy of $5,000 must be reversed • and it is so ordered.