Ross v. Brusie
F. H. ROSS v. JAMES BRUSIE
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Per Curiam.
are of opinion that the court erred in sustaining the objection on the ground of incompetency to the following question put to the plaintiff while testifying: “ Did you at any time within three years have any conversation with the defendant relative to the execution of this deed and bond?”
Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded.
Hearing in Bank denied.
Cited by
- Harp v. Harp Sac. No. 977. · 1902-05-28
- Vance v. Anderson S. F. No. 1 · 1896-07-28