People v. Whitely
THE PEOPLE v. ADELINE WHITELY
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Pee (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Pee
Pee Curiam.
think it appears that the examination was before a police magistrate. The commitment is signed by “James Lawler, Judge of the Police Judge’s Court No. 2, of the city and county of San Francisco.”
The defendant ivas charged with the crime of grand larceny, and the jury, by their verdict, found her “ guilty as charged.” This was a sufficient finding of the degree.
Judgment and orders appealed from affirmed.
Cited by
- People v. Sachau Docket No. 922. · 1926-07-14
- People v. Perez No. 20713 · 1890-12-15
- People v. Manners No. 20170 · 1886-08-24
- People v. Price No. 20092 · 1885-08-22