Burns v. Hodgdon
JOSEPH BURNS v. WADSWORTH HODGDON
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Ross (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Ross
Ross, J.
This case comes up upon the judgment roll. The point made for the defendant is that the plaintiffs are concluded by the judgment rendered in a certain action entitled Hodgdon v. Griffin et al.
As conclusive against the defendant on this point, it is suffi*73cient to refer to the sixth finding of the court below, which reads: “The right, title, and claim now set up by the plaintiffs herein are not the same which were tried and determined in said suit brought by said Hodgdon, but the plaintiffs here have title in fee to said premises, and a right to the possession thereof, which were not tried nor determined, nor within any of the issues involved in said suit brought by Wadsworth Hodgdon.”
Judgment affirmed.
McKinstby, J., and McKee, J., concurred.
Cited by
- Nemo v. Farrington Civ. No. 413. · 1908-01-20