Cox v. Hayes
THOMAS COX v. JOHN HAYES
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Ross (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Ross
Ross, J.
JF. R. and A. O. Larkin, being the owners of a certain quarter section of land, conveyed to one Campbell a small portion of it taken from the' southeasterly part of the quarter section and containing 22.29 acres. Afterwards the Larkins conveyed to one Hudson and Hudson to the plaintiffs “ the east one hundred acres (of the quarter section), commencing on the west bank of the Feather River and running back to the westward far enough so as to contain one hundred acres, and so as to comprise the east one hundred acres (of the quarter section), excepting therefrom a small piece of land sold by F. R. and A. O. Larkin to A. W. Campbell.”
If by this deed one hundred acres of the quarter section were conveyed, the judgment should be affirmed. -If, on the other hand, from the one hundred acres mentioned in it, is to be deducted the tract previously conveyed to Campbell, the judgment must be reversed. The language of the deed is awkward, but we think its true construction is that it conveys the east one hundred acres, etc., excepting therefrom the 22.29 acres previously conveyed to Campbell. In other words, that the deed in question conveyed 77.71 acres only.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
McKixstby, J., Thobntox, J., Mybick, J., and Shabpsteix, J., concurred.
McKee, J., dissented.
Cited by
- Cox v. Hayes No. 9903 · 1885-08-26