Buckner v. Veuve
R. B. BUCKNER v. W. P. VEUVE
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Per Curiam.
— Quo warranta lies to prevent the usurpation of an office. Prohibition is not available as a remedy for that purpose.
Application for a writ of prohibition denied.
Cited by
- Nielsen v. Gregory Civ. No. 2610. · 1923-01-25
- People v. Toal No. 20610 · 1890-08-04