gno.law

Gibbs v. Bartlett

California Supreme Court · · 1883-02-02 · Published · 63 Cal. 117 · 1883 Cal. LEXIS 375

F. A. GIBBS v. WASHINGTON BARTLETT

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The duties sought to be enforced on the part of the respondents are clearly enjoined by law. Performance of these duties cannot be refused on the ground set up by *118respondents, to wit, that there may not be sufficient funds in the treasury to defray the expenses of the election.

Let the writ issue as prayed.

Cited by