Broadribb v. Tibbetts
WILLIAM H. BROADRIBB, an Insane Person, by H. GOODCELL, Jr., his Guardian v. LUTHER C. TIBBETTS
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court :
The appeal in this case is “from the order of said Court [the Superior Court of San Bernardino County] denying defendant’s motion for judgment by default against H. Goodcell, Jr., guardian of William Broadribb, insane, for the sum of one hundred and thirty-seven dollars and forty-four cents, *616and that Goodcell be removed from the position of guardian, as prayed in defendants’ cross complaint.” .
Section 963, C. C. P., enumerates the cases in which an appeal may he taken from a Superior Court to the Supreme Court, and the order above specified is not embraced in said enumeration.
Appeal dismissed.