People v. Hartman
THE PEOPLE v. H. HARTMAN
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court :
The appellant was indicted for the crime of grand larceny, and on the trial the District Attorney was permitted, against the objection of defendant, to introduce evidence tending to show that the defendant had at another time stolen other property than that described in the indictment. This was error. (Walker v. Commonwealth, 1 Leigh, 574; State v. Daubert, 42 Mo. 242; State v. Goetz, 34 Mo. 85.)
Judgment and order reversed.
Cited by
- People v. Picaroni Crim. 1016 · 1955-03-18
- People v. Gibson Docket No. 1908. · 1930-07-02
- People v. Ellis Crim. No. 2379. · 1922-05-05
- People v. Carpenter Crim. No. 884. · 1902-05-20
- Williams v. Casebeer L.A. Nos. 514 and 611. · 1899-09-14
- People v. Smith No. 21158 · 1895-02-06
- People v. Cunningham No. 20,002 · 1885-04-29