Carpentier v. Bartlett
HORACE W. CARPENTIER v. JOSEPH D. BARTLETT
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court:
The motion to dismiss the appeal in this case must be denied. The Clerk’s certificate does not show that any notice of appeal had been served. On the contrary, he does certify that “ notice of appeal was never served, as appears from the files.” The respondent attempts to supply the omission by an affidavit of service of said notice. But that can not be received in lieu of the Clerk’s certificate, which the rule of this Court requires. (See Frederick v. Tierney, 54 Cal. 583.)
Motion denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- Frederick v. Tierney No. 6,924; No. 6,925 · 1880-07-01