Blackman v. Marsicano
A. BLACKMAN v. P. MARSICANO
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court :
The claim of lien in this case, in stating the terms, time given, and conditions of the contract, used the words, “ cash upon demand, in gold coin of the United States.” This was a substantial compliance with the requirement of the statute. The case of Hooper v. Flood (54 Cal. 221) presented a statement quite different in effect from that here presented.
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Cites, in this corpus
- Hooper v. Flood No. 6,018 · 1880-07-01
Cited by
- Castagnetto v. Coppertown Mining & Smelting Co. S.F. No. 3422. · 1905-02-25
- Kelley v. Plover No. 15401 · 1894-06-12
- Tredinnick v. Red Cloud Consolidated Mining Co. Nos. 9816, 9817 · 1887-02-21