Clark v. Clayton
WILLIAM H. CLARK v. CHARLES CLAYTON
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court:
In this cause we are of opinion that the action was prematurely brought, and the nonsuit was properly granted.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Satinover v. Dean B026373 · 1988-07-21
- Nuclear Electronic Laboratories, Inc. v. William C. Cornell Co. Civ. 22302 · 1965-12-22
- Casitas Investment Co. v. Charles L. Harney, Inc. Civ. 19569; Civ. 19546 · 1962-05-22
- Marsh Bros. & Gardenier, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. Docket No. 5907. · 1929-03-12
- Lambert v. Haskell No. 11503 · 1889-09-30
- Dougherty v. Dore · 1883-02-16