People v. Giesea
THE PEOPLE v. FREDRICK E. GIESEA
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court :
Information for bigamy. The Court sustained the demur*54rer to the information on the ground that it does not state at what place the defendant was first married. But in this respect the District Attorney appears to have followed the precedents given by Archbold and Wharton, and we do not think that the code requires anything more.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the Court below to overrule the demurrer, with leave to the defendant to plead to the information.
Cited by
- People v. Ellis Docket No. Crim. 3072. · 1928-04-13
- People v. Priestley Crim. No. 342. · 1911-09-27