Daley v. Cunningham
ANNIE DALEY v. J. A. CUNNINGHAM
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court:
We do not think there was any misjoinder of parties plaintiff in this canse (C. C. P., 382), and are of the opinion that the demurrer on that ground was properly overruled.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment and order are affirmed.
Cited by
- Hall v. Southern Pacific Co. Civ. No. 2705. · 1919-02-21
- Bassot v. United Railroads Civ. No. 2362. · 1918-12-04