Broadribb v. Tibbets
WM. H. BROADRIBB, an Insane Person, by H. GOOD-CELL, Jr., his Guardian v. LUTHER C. TIBBETS
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court:
The appeal in this case is “from the order of said Court (the Superior Court of San Bemandino county) denying defendant’s motion for judgment by default against H. Good-cell, Jr., guardian of William Broadribb, insane, for the sum of one hundred and thirty-seven dollars and forty-four cents, and that said Goodcell be removed from the position of guardian as prayed in defendant’s cross-complaint.”
Section 963, C. C. P., enumerates the cases in which an appeal may be taken from a Superior Court to the Supreme Court, and the order above specified is not embraced in said enumeration.
Appeal dismissed.
Cited by
- Barbaria v. Independent Elevator Co. Civ. 16659 · 1955-06-15
- Sharon v. Sharon No. 9984 · 1885-06-29