Trobock v. Caro
ANTONIO TROBOCK v. WOLF CARO
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court :
This was an action brought to recover rent due for three months of the year 1879, upon a lease of certain premises in the City and County of San Francisco. The defense was that the lease was void, because the premises were let for an illegal purpose. But the Court found that they were not let for an illegal purpose. Even if there were a conflict of evidence the finding would not be disturbed; but the evidence in the record fully sustains the finding.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Cited by
- Dalzell v. Superior Court of San Benito County No. 11217 · 1885-09-23