Myers v. Hamilton
F. F. MYERS v. N. HAMILTON, Judges of the Superior Court etc
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court :
The petitioner applies for a writ of review to correct alleged errors of the respondents in declaring a vacancy in the office of Supervisor, and in appointing a person to fill the vacancy.
Even if the appointing power rested with the respondents, the exercise of that power was not the exercise of a judicial function within the meaning of Section 1068, C. C. P. (People v. Bush, 40 Cal. 344.)
The motion to quash the proceedings is granted.
Cites, in this corpus
- People ex rel. McDonald v. Bush No, 2,597 · 1870-10-15
Cited by
- Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San Francisco No.14401 · 1894-01-03