People v. Devine
THE PEOPLE v. THOMAS DEVINE
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court:
In this cause, in which the defendant was accused by information of an assault with intent to commit murder, the Court instructed the jury inter alia as follows: “An assault to commit murder is an unlawful intent coupled with a present ability to kill a human being with malice aforethought.”
To this there was an exception by defendant. It is manifestly erroneous, and was so admitted to be by the Attorney General. It omits an essential element to constitute the offense, viz., an attempt on the part of the accused, which attempt must itself be unlawful. This necessary constituent of the offense is ignored entirely in the instruction excepted to. (Penal Code, § 240.)
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.