Laugenour v. Hennagin
THOMAS F. LAUGENOUR v. GEORGE T. HENNAGIN
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court:
Upon the facts appearing, the right of the plaintiff to the certificate of purchase for the land in dispute, which forms a part of the five hundred thousand acre grant, is no longer open to controversy. (Wright v. Laugenour, 55 Cal. 280; Laugenour v. Shanklin, 57 id. 70.)
By Section 1925 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the certificate is made primary evidence that the holder is the owner of the land described therein.
We discover no error in the record.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Wright v. Laugenour No. 6,571 · 1880-07-01
Cited by
- Witcher v. Conklin No. 13291 · 1890-06-12
- Cucamonga Fruit-Land Co. v. Moir No. 13055 · 1890-02-05
- Goodwin v. McCabe No. 11293 · 1888-04-21