Moran v. McCoy
THOMAS MORAN v. H. L. McCOY
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court:
The Court found that the property in controversy was owned by one Pauline Rowze, on the thirtieth day of November, 1877, and that it was on that day sold and delivered by said Rowze to the plaintiff. There was sufficient evidence to support the finding. The judgment and order are therefore affirmed.