Washburn v. Wilkinson
LORINDA WASHBURN v. THOMAS S. WILKINSON et Ux.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court:
It is not averred in the complaint that the mortgagor failed to keep the mortgaged property insured, or that the mortgagee conformed to the power contained in the mortgage in respect to the insurance. Neither is there any evidence of any insurance money having been paid by the mortgagee prior to the commencement of the action; besides, there is no supplemental complaint averring any payment of insurance since such commencement. It was, therefore, error for the Court to allow the plaintiff the amount paid by her for insurance.
Cause remanded, with instructions to modify the decree in accordance with this opinion.
Cited by
- Strickler Co. v. Eisner Civ. 9316 · 1935-03-22
- Galliano v. Kilfoy No. 14186 · 1892-03-28
- Cummings v. Conlan No. 9,371 · 1885-02-05