Loomis v. County of Los Angeles
LOOMIS v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Milton H. Myrick (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Myrick
Myrick, J.:
This action was brought to recover of the County of Los Angeles an amount of money alleged to have been paid by plaintiff under the following circumstances:
The Tax Collector sold at public auction, to plaintiff, for non-payment of State and County taxes, certain real property assessed to one Acuña, plaintiff, as purchaser, paying the amount of the taxes (which amount was by the Tax Collector paid into the County Treasury), and a certificate was duly issued to plaintiff. It subsequently appeared that the assessment was fatally defective, and plaintiff took no title to the lands attempted to be sold. He now brings his action to recover of the county the amount paid by him, basing his. *457right to recover on Section 3804, Political Code. That section does not apply to a case of this kind. There is no rule of law authorizing the plaintiff to recover.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Sharpstein and Thornton, JJ., concurred.
Cited by
- Ribeiro v. County of El Dorado No. C065505 · 2011-05-10
- People v. Chambers L. A. 21478 · 1951-07-13
- Routh v. Quinn L. A. 18215 · 1942-06-30
- Coleman v. County of Los Angeles L. A. No. 4915. · 1919-07-09
- MacHado v. Canty Civ. No. 872. · 1912-01-13
- Stewart Law & Collection Co. v. County of Alameda S.F. No. 3693. · 1904-04-01
- Hayes v. County of Los Angeles No. 19103 · 1893-07-21
- Grimley v. County of Santa Clara No. 8965 · 1886-02-25
- O'Brien v. County of Colusa No. 9609 · 1885-09-26