People v. Tarpey
THE PEOPLE v. MICHAEL TARPEY
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court:
The information charges that the crime of robbery was committed by the defendant at the City and County of San Francisco, to which the defendant pleaded “Hot guilty.” There is no evidence that the defendant did commit that crime at said city and county. It is not stated in the evidence where the crime was committed. This is a sufficient ground for reversing the judgment and order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial. (People v. Fisher, 51 Cal. 319.)
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Fisher No. 10,206 · 1876-07-01