gno.law

People v. Craig

California Supreme Court · No. 10,616 · 1881-07-15 · Published · 59 Cal. 370

THE PEOPLE v. TIMOTHY CRAIG

Area
criminal
Panel
Milton H. Myrick (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Myrick

Myrick, J.:

The defendant was tried and convicted on an indictment framed under section 148 of the Penal Code. The charge is, that he “ did willfully and unlawfully resist, delay, and obstruct one H. E. West, a public officer, to wit, duly elected, qualified, and acting Constable of Pajaro Township, of the County of Monterey, of the State of California, in the discharge and attempt to discharge his duty as such officer, to wit, in the service of a warrant for the arrest of said Timothy Craig, on a warrant duly issued and placed in said H. E. West’s hands as such Constable, by one M. L. Ketchum, a *371Justice of the Peace of said county, charging said Timothy Craig with an assault with a deadly weapon, contrary,” etc. To this indictment a demurrer was interposed on behalf of the defendant, and the same was overruled by the Court.

We are of the opinion that the demurrer should have been sustained, as it does not appear from the indictment, that the offense was committed in the County of Monterey, or that the Justice had any jurisdiction to issue the warrant.

Judgment and order reversed.

Shabpstein" and Thobnton, JJ., concurred.

Cited by