Ferry v. Hammond
T. W. FERRY v. JOHN W. HAMMOND
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court:
It was decided by this Court, when this case came before it on a former appeal, that the answer of the defendants presented a valid defense to the action, and that the Court erred in sustaining a motion to strike out those portions of it which on this appeal are most material. (Ferry v. Hammond, 2 Pac. C. L. J. 125.)
*28After the case was remanded to the Court below it came on for trial there, and the defendants offered to prove those averments of their answer which this Court had held would constitute a complete defense to the action, and the Court below sustained an objection to the introduction of evidence to prove the same. We think that the exception to this ruling was well taken.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Cited by
- Hill v. Maryland Casualty Co. Civ. No. 1741. · 1915-09-28