Utter v. Eames
F. W. UTTER v. HENRY A. EAMES
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Coubt (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Coubt
The Coubt:
There was evidence in this case which tended to prove that the defendant at a certain time was indebted to the Eagle Copper and Silver Mining Company, of which the plaintiff was Secretary and Treasurer, in the sum of two thousand dollars, which the plaintiff, at the request of the defendant, paid, and took the promissory notes of the defendant, sued upon in this action therefor. If there is any evidence tending to prove the contrary, it simply constitutes a conflict in the evidence. Findings were waived, and as the judgment is in favor of the plaintiff, the presumption is that the Court found in favor of the plaintiff upon that, as well as upon every other controverted question in the case.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Rankin v. Newman No. 15731 · 1895-06-29