Ward v. Superior Court
GEORGE WARD v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MARIN COUNTY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Ross (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Ross
Ross, J.:
One of the conditions of the undertaking on appeal was, that the appellant would pay all costs recovered against him in the appellate court. Neither the circumstance that the amount of the bond was more than one hundred dollars, nor the other circumstance, that it was insufficient in amount to operate a stay of execution, rendered the appeal ineffectual.
Writ denied and proceedings dismissed.
McKinstry, J., and McKee, J., concurred.
Cited by
- Rich v. Superior Court Civ. No. 1595. · 1916-10-14
- Edwards v. Superior Court, in & for the Cty. of Alameda S.F. No. 5858. · 1911-04-28
- Thomas, Jr. v. Hawkins Civ. No. 692. · 1909-12-30
- Pacific Window Glass Co. v. Smith Civ. No. 506. · 1908-09-09
- Rutledge v. Superior Court of Humboldt County No. 11053 · 1885-05-28
- Beatty v. Superior Court No. 8800 · 1883-02-15