Jeffreys v. Hancock
THOMAS JEFFREYS v. HENRY HANCOCK
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court:
This action was brought to recover the sum of $710, claimed by the plaintiff to be due him from defendant for services rendered, and for board paid by him under a contract with the defendant. The case was tried by a jury, and a verdict was rendered for the sum of $683.
Two points were made on the appeal: First, that the verdict *647is not sustained by the evidence ; and, second, that the Court erred in striking out and excluding evidence under defendant’s cross-complaint.
In answer to the first point it is only necessary to say that there was sufficient evidence in support of plaintiff’s claim to justify the verdict; and so far as the cross-complaint is concerned, we need only remark that the matters therein contained constituted no defense or counter-claim (Code Civ. Proc. § 438), or matter of cross-complaint (Code Civ. Proc. § 442), to plaintiff’s action.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Cited by
- White Lighting Co. v. Wolfson L. A. 29493 · 1968-03-14
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. Barnes Civ. 91 · 1962-06-29
- Commercial Credit Co. v. Peak Docket No. S.F. 10859. · 1924-12-02
- United Casting Co. v. Duncan Civ. No. 3112. · 1919-11-21
- Clark v. Kelley L.A. No. 2863. · 1912-06-27